Base Exclusion and Warehouse fixes
Forums › General Discussion › Base Exclusion and Warehouse fixes-
🐾ყȏɠɪ🐾 wrote:
SameThe game has never allowed me to put more than 2 warehouses on a base.
-
Jim Dirt wrote:
ZRAYGO wrote:
Thanks Zraygo. Now go reattach your lips to Nicks behind. It might be getting cold...You own nothing in this game. Nick owes you nothing.
Lmao!!
-
I just want to repeat what havoc and others have said. When we went past 8 upgrades our base told us we had( in my case) 12 upgrades. Like 12 of 12, it didnt say 12 of 8 or something like that. We simply found the way to get the most upgrades on the base. So what im saying is that i want my upgrades back because we didnt know it was an "exploitation"
-
BЯʘʘKLYИ wrote:
If it was meant to do in the game everyone would of been doing it...🐾ყȏɠɪ🐾 wrote:
SameThe game has never allowed me to put more than 2 warehouses on a base.
-
So basically it's Nicks way of saying you lose?
-
I for one have spent just as much money on this game as some of the socalled big spenders. I never tried to figure out the glitch in the game, although I did inquire about it. Everyone knew it wasnt right and it was only a matterof time before it was stopped. If it is allowed to keep the turf where the hops took place, then the guys who have played the game without taking advantage of this mishap in the game need to be compensated also. Just my two cents, seems like everyone got screwedon this deal...
-
★ ICΣPICK★ wrote:
I for one didnt know it wasnt right. It was as simple as putting two warehouses on and then putting more on one at a time. So saying everyone knew it was wrong is a bit of a strech.I for one have spent just as much money on this game as some of the socalled big spenders. I never tried to figure out the glitch in the game, although I did inquire about it. Everyone knew it wasnt right and it was only a matterof time before it was stopped. If it is allowed to keep the turf where the hops took place, then the guys who have played the game without taking advantage of this mishap in the game need to be compensated also. Just my two cents, seems like everyone got screwedon this deal...
-
*stretch
-
★ ICΣPICK★ wrote:
Ok, just out of curiousity. You are looking to be compensated because you didn't do anything nor did you attempt to do anything? Seriously?I for one have spent just as much money on this game as some of the socalled big spenders. I never tried to figure out the glitch in the game, although I did inquire about it. Everyone knew it wasnt right and it was only a matterof time before it was stopped. If it is allowed to keep the turf where the hops took place, then the guys who have played the game without taking advantage of this mishap in the game need to be compensated also. Just my two cents, seems like everyone got screwedon this deal...
-
Kobestud wrote:
The first time it allowed me to put 4 on right off the start★ ICΣPICK★ wrote:
I for one didnt know it wasnt right. It was as simple as putting two warehouses on and then putting more on one at a time. So saying everyone knew it was wrong is a bit of a strech.I for one have spent just as much money on this game as some of the socalled big spenders. I never tried to figure out the glitch in the game, although I did inquire about it. Everyone knew it wasnt right and it was only a matterof time before it was stopped. If it is allowed to keep the turf where the hops took place, then the guys who have played the game without taking advantage of this mishap in the game need to be compensated also. Just my two cents, seems like everyone got screwedon this deal...
-
Seriously, you think because you used an error in the game you get to keep your gains just because you spent money?? I also spent money...... All I am saying is if he allows the gains made in this game to stay he either needs to make it for everyone or for noone...
-
This is the first I've heard of this!!
👀 ✌ -
★ ICΣPICK★ wrote:
Anyone could do this, it wasn't just for "spenders" as you like to call them. If you either put in the effort to try new things or if people around you share info this is something that was out there. Just because you didn't attempt to do it doesn't mean you couldn't do it.Seriously, you think because you used an error in the game you get to keep your gains just because you spent money?? I also spent money...... All I am saying is if he allows the gains made in this game to stay he either needs to make it for everyone or for noone...
-
⌖ Viper ⌖ wrote:
Absolutely correct, which is why I am hoping he leaves it as is..★ ICΣPICK★ wrote:
Anyone could do this, it wasn't just for "spenders" as you like to call them. If you either put in the effort to try new things or if people around you share info this is something that was out there. Just because you didn't attempt to do it doesn't mean you couldn't do it.Seriously, you think because you used an error in the game you get to keep your gains just because you spent money?? I also spent money...... All I am saying is if he allows the gains made in this game to stay he either needs to make it for everyone or for noone...
-
Since the issue seems to be all about "fairness", give those players who did NOT "exploit" the game (whether knowingly or unknowingly) the opportunity to do so. Those who partook of the "exploitation" may not further "exploit" the game until such time as those who had NOT "exploited" the game have had equal opportunity to do so. Situation dealt with......you're welcome! 😉
-
I love how people justify there cheating, it cracks me up. Some of you should run for office your so full of crap. Its simple exploiting a glitch to gain a competitive advantage is a violation of the so called TOS. The right thing to do is remove all bases built using this glitch.
-
★ ICΣPICK★ wrote:
Absolutely "incorrect". There were those players who were unable to "exploit" the system. So technically, "anyone" could NOT do it.⌖ Viper ⌖ wrote:
Absolutely correct, which is why I am hoping he leaves it as is..★ ICΣPICK★ wrote:
Anyone could do this, it wasn't just for "spenders" as you like to call them. If you either put in the effort to try new things or if people around you share info this is something that was out there. Just because you didn't attempt to do it doesn't mean you couldn't do it.Seriously, you think because you used an error in the game you get to keep your gains just because you spent money?? I also spent money...... All I am saying is if he allows the gains made in this game to stay he either needs to make it for everyone or for noone...
-
Agreed Nate, hoping he keeps it and tweeks it and brings knowledge to the table so all can use it, after reading some comments I think everyone likes the idea of being able to hop this way.
-
For all of the "exploiters", let them keep the rewards for their exploitation. It's that very spirit of testing boundaries and bravely venturing into a brand new world (200 miles at a time) that motivates us all to be better gamers! I for one applaud the genius of your "exploits"!!
Devs, what say ye to restricting the "exploiters" for the period of 1 month and allowing the "non exploiters" the ability to "exploit" for that same period? All those in favor.............. -
Enough! All whiners get out of my pants!!!
👎
-
★ ICΣPICK★ wrote:
Base hopping is one thing; doing it 200 miles at a time is quite another. If everyone wants this game to be Turf Wars then quite frankly.......go play turf wars. I'm hoping this game is quite different and that mass transit is not an option. That sort of throws the whole GPS thing right out the window. I think you should have to physically be in an area to build a base or at the very least, it should cost you significantly to get where your going. Whether that cost is real world dollars or a two year mission to hop from one coast to the other I really don't care.Agreed Nate, hoping he keeps it and tweeks it and brings knowledge to the table so all can use it, after reading some comments I think everyone likes the idea of being able to hop this way.
-
⚔ཛ།ǜʐiᎧས⚔ wrote:
*their * you're * it's Anyway, are you saying that jukebox, who simply put 4 warehouses on to start, wrongfully justified his abilility to equip 12 upgrades, knew this was "cheating," and should run for office? I personally call B.S. If it let you put 4 warehouses on to start, there is no reason to think that it is a cheat.I love how people justify there cheating, it cracks me up. Some of you should run for office your so full of crap. Its simple exploiting a glitch to gain a competitive advantage is a violation of the so called TOS. The right thing to do is remove all bases built using this glitch.
-
ᎾɠʉɳЂэΒlʉɳτ wrote:
Here here!Enough! All whiners get out of my pants!!!
👎
-
fact is players spent:
Money
Tib
Resources
Game $
UpgradesThese are considered in-game purchases to those who spent real money on the game, and those who don't spend money will especially know the importance of the above list. Nick sold us these products and now he is talking about revoking these products without any kind of refund. That would simply be unacceptable in the real world and therefore since we are dealing with real money in this case, it should be considered unacceptable in this game.
A lot of people is this game seem to have a vendetta against paying players, whatever their motive for this, their feelings shouldn't have any impact on a decision to give real people a refund for a product they have paid for and then had taken off them.
The game developers need to take this seriously and consider the implications cos I reckon they've made a real problem for themselves with this outburst notification.
-
So everyone is mad because they simply did not equip more warehouses when they had the chance? How is suddenly reducing the number of equitable warehouses cheating?
-
SILVER FOӾ wrote:
People are saying that equiping the warehouses in the first place was cheating, not the reduction.So everyone is mad because they simply did not equip more warehouses when they had the chance? How is suddenly reducing the number of equitable warehouses cheating?
-
Rehash.........my suggestion was to let the "exploiters" keep their bases w/upgrades. Lets start suggesting viable solutions rather than arguing around the same mountain. if someone else has a better suggestion by all means, please suggest it.
-
Natedogg wrote:
★ ICΣPICK★ wrote:
Absolutely incorrect. This was a game strategy available to everyone.⌖ Viper ⌖ wrote:
Absolutely "incorrect". There were those players who were unable to "exploit" the system. So technically, "anyone" could NOT do it.★ ICΣPICK★ wrote:
Absolutely correct, which is why I am hoping he leaves it as is..Seriously, you think because you used an error in the game you get to keep your gains just because you spent money?? I also spent money...... All I am saying is if he allows the gains made in this game to stay he either needs to make it for everyone or for noone...
-
I am fine with or without the reduction. If there is a reduction, I want my upgrades and my resources that I used back. There is an argument because some suggest that there should not be compensation.
-
Nate, unfortunately I'm pretty sure it isn't going to be settled by any discussion we have here. Chances are if Nick stated accurately that we will be notified tomorrow, the decision of the "how" has already been made. It's just going to be a matter of will the end result be a success or will it result in people possibly going as far as walking away or somewhere in between.
![[][]](https://www.globalsupremacyapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC