Get Global Supremacy Now!

Grouped Bases

• Treybo130 Jul 12, 2013

  Bases in close proximity should reinforce each other defensively. If a group is together then the defense should be increased by a percentage of the influence. That way small guys can protect an area and the big guys will spend a shit load of money to take over larger areas. That being said, they won't be invincible like TWs because C4 will lower the influence of the bases hence lowering the overall defense incentive.
• ▪False▪ Jul 12, 2013

  Great idea. I'm currently deciding whether to take control of 5-10 countie or just holding off the two I already own. If this is implemented, I'll probably just consolidate all of my influence into the two counties.
• Treybo130 Jul 12, 2013

  Exactly. A lot of us spread out too far and too fast just to own a county with one turf. Now I have one turf in other people's counties. I would just assume teardown and rebuild in masses. Right now there's no incentive to do that really.
• ▪False▪ Jul 12, 2013

  Before I realized that this isn't a game you can play from your couch to hop, I had 19 bases all within a mile of me. All within the same fraction of a township. That is consolidation, lol.
• Ebony Wolf Jul 14, 2013

  Never even thought of something like that. I like it, though. 👍
• ɅɭɭMᗅNЯ Jul 15, 2013

  I like it a lot, I hope the commissioner takes notice of this thread
• Mr.D-Killer Jul 15, 2013

  +7👍
• Treybo130 Jul 15, 2013

  I submitted this same idea to turf wars but I was several years too late.
• Zombify Him Now Jul 16, 2013

  Nice Idea :) one chuck norris thumb up
• Treybo130 Jul 27, 2013

  Bump
• ɅɭɭMᗅNЯ Jul 27, 2013

  Treybo130 wrote:

  Bump

  Indeed (secret bump)
• TWISTER Aug 7, 2013

  Bump
• ɅɭɭMᗅNЯ Aug 7, 2013

  Bump
• Dunlap2041 Sep 7, 2013

  Stop bumping this thread. It is a stupid idea.
• 🐐山羊猿🐒 Sep 24, 2013

  Ebony Wolf wrote:

  Never even thought of something like that. I like it, though. 👍

  I like.
• RovingScot Sep 25, 2013

  Great idea, the sooner they implement the better.
• 🌟 ℕᎾℛᏆℋ💫ЅᏆᎯℛ 🌟 Oct 15, 2013

  The way I see it this would only work well if the combined bases only take up one worker. Good idea.
• Treybo130 Oct 21, 2013

  Each base remains as is but bases that fall inwith a certain radius of each other will create a blast wall like defense. It would need to be a low percentage to discourage a 100 bases being built on top of each other in an invincible formation.
• RaiKou Oct 23, 2013

  Bump
• Treybo130 Nov 2, 2013

  I've expanded across the country but continue to stand by this idea. I was told that Turf Wars is too "established" to implement but this game is still new and this idea will greatly aid the noobs.
• This game blows Nov 10, 2013

  Bump. This makes gobs of sense.
• Treybo130 Dec 5, 2013

  We receive perks from teammates but not ourselves?
• iPHONE STALLONE Dec 8, 2013

  Not sure of precisely the best way to implement this idea but the concept is 👍👍👍, it would help little guys starting off in their own neighborhoods not get destroyed by the big national powers.

  As soon as I could build warehouses my first nine 361 inf bases in my town were all capped within 5 minutes and I just about deleted the app over it.
• Yolo360 Jan 13, 2014

  +1 good idea
• Treybo130 Mar 1, 2014

  I would like to see this combined with a perk that protects bases dropped using actual GPS location. Both of these ideas benefit the smaller, new players.
• DarkPwnage Mar 19, 2014

  Holy popularnesssss
• Psych May 11, 2014

  +1 👍
• Psych May 13, 2014

  Treybo130 wrote:

  I would like to see this combined with a perk that protects bases dropped using actual GPS location. Both of these ideas benefit the smaller, new players.

  I don't think this would benefit lil guys. What if some giant player dropped in on you by driving and you couldn't take his base? A good thought but...
• Treybo130 May 15, 2014

  Psych wrote:

  Treybo130 wrote:

  I would like to see this combined with a perk that protects bases dropped using actual GPS location. Both of these ideas benefit the smaller, new players.

  I don't think this would benefit lil guys. What if some giant player dropped in on you by driving and you couldn't take his base? A good thought but...

  They're not going to take a "big players" base anyway. You can still C4 it, but not acquire it. Plus, big players build one or two bases and only the one GPS built base should have the perk. Any bases built off of it wouldn't benefit. My point is to add a perk to true travels and not long distance hoppers.
• ШÎŁĐΣМΛЙ Nov 5, 2014

  I agree with this concept to a point. Multiple Bases within acquisition range could reinforce each other. Central bases for cash and agents and perimeter bases could be used to protect the central ones. For this to truly work something has to be done to the other useless defensive upgrades like blast walls and the like. There needs to be an incentive to take the influence hit on each base. That being said, what's the point to placing a comm center or a casino or anything else other than a distribution center to build influence. If these lower influence building upgrades had perks other than influence maybe players would actually want to have a lower influence per base if there was an overall defensive perk with the ability to protect their agent or influence heavy bases.
• 🗻nosterZ17🗻 Feb 5, 2015

  Psych wrote:

  Treybo130 wrote:

  I would like to see this combined with a perk that protects bases dropped using actual GPS location. Both of these ideas benefit the smaller, new players.

  I don't think this would benefit lil guys. What if some giant player dropped in on you by driving and you couldn't take his base? A good thought but...

  Maybe the perk is only applicable to those of a lower level, for example and I believe this spot, level 35