Get Global Supremacy Now!

Syndicate "Officers"

• 𝗟𝗢𝗚𝗔𝗡 Jun 30, 2013

  I think there should be officers in Syndicates. They would be a rank above the members but they wouldn't have as much power as the leader. What do you think?
• Marvelous Jul 3, 2013

  Yes, bump.
• Alex Jul 3, 2013

  I reckon there should be a few different ranks like Boss, underboss, officer, member. All with varying powers
• Psych Jul 3, 2013

  Alex wrote:

  I reckon there should be a few different ranks like Boss, underboss, officer, member. All with varying powers
• ⚡Ƭعㅆ℘عʂϮ⚡★Ꮜ͢ℕ Jul 3, 2013

  Psych wrote:

  Alex wrote:

  I reckon there should be a few different ranks like Boss, underboss, officer, member. All with varying powers

  Kind of like the various admin levels in pal
• 𝗟𝗢𝗚𝗔𝗡 Jul 4, 2013

  Alex wrote:

  I reckon there should be a few different ranks like Boss, underboss, officer, member. All with varying powers

  Yeah we just need some kind of ranking system.
• Marvelous Jul 4, 2013

  That'd be swell.
• Psych Jul 4, 2013

  Bump
• Marvelous Jul 4, 2013

  We need these - bump
• Psych Jul 4, 2013

  Bump
• ✧Ɗoͣѵͩɑͩ✧ Jul 4, 2013

  Psych wrote:

  Alex wrote:

  I reckon there should be a few different ranks like Boss, underboss, officer, member. All with varying powers
• тʊʀғᵃ Jul 4, 2013

  JustIntruding wrote:

  We need these - bump

  Why? Why do we need these? It seems quite pointless to me ..
• ⓜagⓟulse Jul 5, 2013

  Why? Why do we need these? It seems quite pointless to me ..
  With 10 possible members, a ranking system, or leader designation, would be helpful when communicating and coordinating actions. I think :)
• Unknown Jul 5, 2013

  Yes. Good idea. Nick, if you are reading this, change this asap
• ℱüℕ6754 Jul 5, 2013

  👍👍👍👍
• Psych Jul 5, 2013

  Bump
• Psych Jul 5, 2013

  Unknown wrote:

  Yes. Good idea. Nick, if you are reading this, change this asap
• 𝗟𝗢𝗚𝗔𝗡 Jul 6, 2013

  Psych wrote:

  Bump
• ZRAYGO Jul 6, 2013

  Look out for the ban hammer for bumping. Post something at least semi-intelligent instead of bumping.
• 🍁J.U.🍁 Jul 6, 2013

  I really dont see the point of this. It is, after all, only ten people. Ive played games where alliances have been hundred or more, and they didnt need officers, members, taxmen, dogwalkers or pooper scoopers. These were loosely appointed by the team creators.

  If you really need this in your syndicate, then create it yourself. Put a post on your syn's private wall, create a game forum on one of many websites, discuss it in pal.
• 𝗟𝗢𝗚𝗔𝗡 Jul 6, 2013

  🍁J.U.🍁Ꮜ͢ℕ★ wrote:

  I really dont see the point of this. It is, after all, only ten people. Ive played games where alliances have been hundred or more, and they didnt need officers, members, taxmen, dogwalkers or pooper scoopers. These were loosely appointed by the team creators.

  If you really need this in your syndicate, then create it yourself. Put a post on your syn's private wall, create a game forum on one of many websites, discuss it in pal.

  It would make the game more interesting and fun.
• 𝗟𝗢𝗚𝗔𝗡 Jul 6, 2013

  ZRAYGO wrote:

  Look out for the ban hammer for bumping. Post something at least semi-intelligent instead of bumping.

  We're just trying to get this in the game, that's all.