C4 not agents

Forums โ€บ General Discussion โ€บ C4 not agents
  • Tea Sipper

    I reckon the way forward is not to have bases or agents but to stock more C4 than anyone. That way you can damage them but they can't damage you.

  • ๐ŸบSquirrel+Pig๐Ÿบ

    Some players are already there. But if this becomes the standard for everyone, there's no point in playing.

  • ๐Ÿiamcanadian๐Ÿ

    C4 is last weeks news... Now its all about c5

  • Tea Sipper

    A4 is best

  • ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ

    Bam pot wrote:

    I reckon the way forward is not to have bases or agents but to stock more C4 than anyone. That way you can damage them but they can't damage you.

    How can you damage them if you suggest they have no bases or agents ? Barm pot fuck off ye bore go an play FarmVille

  • Tea Sipper

    ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    I reckon the way forward is not to have bases or agents but to stock more C4 than anyone. That way you can damage them but they can't damage you.

    How can you damage them if you suggest they have no bases or agents ? Barm pot fuck off ye bore go an play FarmVille

    There's no need to tell me to fuck off.

  • ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ

    Bam pot wrote:

    ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    I reckon the way forward is not to have bases or agents but to stock more C4 than anyone. That way you can damage them but they can't damage you.

    How can you damage them if you suggest they have no bases or agents ? Barm pot fuck off ye bore go an play FarmVille

    There's no need to tell me to fuck off.

    Why not ?

  • Tea Sipper

    ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    I reckon the way forward is not to have bases or agents but to stock more C4 than anyone. That way you can damage them but they can't damage you.

    How can you damage them if you suggest they have no bases or agents ? Barm pot fuck off ye bore go an play FarmVille

    There's no need to tell me to fuck off.

    Why not ?

    I find it aggressive and offensive and I'd rather that you never spoke to me in that way.

  • ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ

    Bam pot wrote:

    ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    I reckon the way forward is not to have bases or agents but to stock more C4 than anyone. That way you can damage them but they can't damage you.

    How can you damage them if you suggest they have no bases or agents ? Barm pot fuck off ye bore go an play FarmVille

    There's no need to tell me to fuck off.

    Why not ?

    I find it aggressive and offensive and I'd rather that you never spoke to me in that way.

    I'd rather Everton got relegated but you can't have it all can you ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • Tea Sipper

    I know what you mean. I used to play but the woman's game isn't funded enough to make it worthwhile and Everton used to win all the time.

  • ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ

    Bam pot wrote:

    I know what you mean. I used to play but the woman's game isn't funded enough to make it worthwhile and Everton used to win all the time.

    Well what a strange world you live in ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

  • Tea Sipper

    ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    I know what you mean. I used to play but the woman's game isn't funded enough to make it worthwhile and Everton used to win all the time.

    Well what a strange world you live in ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

    I still hate that lot. Got me into hating the mens team too.

  • ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ

    Bam pot wrote:

    ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    I know what you mean. I used to play but the woman's game isn't funded enough to make it worthwhile and Everton used to win all the time.

    Well what a strange world you live in ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

    I still hate that lot. Got me into hating the mens team too.

    Why's that ?

  • Gii

    Screw C5 and A4, it's all about C6H6!

  • Tea Sipper

    ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    ๐Ÿ’ซD@T $C๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘…$โ‚ฌR๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    I know what you mean. I used to play but the woman's game isn't funded enough to make it worthwhile and Everton used to win all the time.

    Well what a strange world you live in ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

    I still hate that lot. Got me into hating the mens team too.

    Why's that ?

    I suppose I started to properly hate them when they played the victim card with Rooney going to Man Utd. They need no realise he's that much a Man Utd player that his blood is red.

  • Tea Sipper

    Gii wrote:

    Screw C5 and A4, it's all about C6H6!

    It's all about R2-D2

  • ๐ŸMrsHotrodtech๐Ÿ’

    Bam pot wrote:

    Gii wrote:

    Screw C5 and A4, it's all about C6H6!

    It's all about R2-D2

    I think it's about C3PO

  • ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—š๐—”๐—ก

    ๐ŸMrsHotrodtech๐Ÿ’ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    Gii wrote:

    Screw C5 and A4, it's all about C6H6!

    It's all about R2-D2

    I think it's about C3PO

    It's about R4-G9, the droid nobody knew.

  • ๐Ÿiamcanadian๐Ÿ

    ๐ŸMrsHotrodtech๐Ÿ’ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    Gii wrote:

    Screw C5 and A4, it's all about C6H6!

    It's all about R2-D2

    I think it's about C3PO

    Shit just got real up in herrrr!

  • ZRAYGO

    You're all wrong. It's all about Double Ds ( โ€ข ) ( โ€ข )

  • ๐Ÿiamcanadian๐Ÿ

    ZRAYGO wrote:

    You're all wrong. It's all about Double Ds ( โ€ข ) ( โ€ข )

    Those dd are way too far apart!!!

  • DOะ˜ ฮ›ฦงฮ›ะฏO

    Check this ๐Ÿ‘‰ ( Y )

  • Tea Sipper

    DOะ˜ ฮ›ฦงฮ›ะฏO wrote:

    Check this ๐Ÿ‘‰ ( Y )

    Nelson Mandela

  • โ‚ฉแพถัตาท โ„ญษพษตษ”สžษ›สˆสˆโ„ข

    Bam pot wrote:

    I reckon the way forward is not to have bases or agents but to stock more C4 than anyone. That way you can damage them but they can't damage you.

    That's a pussy move lol what a pussy ๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†

  • Tฮ›อ’T

    ๐Ÿ’ซStack Bundles๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    I reckon the way forward is not to have bases or agents but to stock more C4 than anyone. That way you can damage them but they can't damage you.

    That's a pussy move lol what a pussy ๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†

    I agree. That style player is a joke to me.

  • HIPPIE๐ŸMAFIA

    Bam pot wrote:

    I reckon the way forward is not to have bases or agents but to stock more C4 than anyone. That way you can damage them but they can't damage you.

    How is that fun?

    I don't want to even try to be good... Just try and ruin other people's fun

  • Tea Sipper

    T/\T2 wrote:

    ๐Ÿ’ซStack Bundles๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    I reckon the way forward is not to have bases or agents but to stock more C4 than anyone. That way you can damage them but they can't damage you.

    That's a pussy move lol what a pussy ๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†

    I agree. That style player is a joke to me.

    I agree. That's why I build bases and get agents. Then people can destroy them with C4.

  • ะฒษชษกษกอซสŒอฃฮฝอฏษ›สŸสŸษชโ„ข

    ๐Ÿ’ซStack Bundles๐Ÿ’ซ wrote:

    Bam pot wrote:

    I reckon the way forward is not to have bases or agents but to stock more C4 than anyone. That way you can damage them but they can't damage you.

    That's a pussy move lol what a pussy ๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†

    Hahah For sure would rather cap bases like in TW. Bahah pussy move

  • Aะธั‚ะฝoะธั‡

    Bam pot wrote:

    Looks like you need to change your name to Ban pot, people don't seem to like your idea.

Reply to this topic

Please login to reply to this topic
[][]

ยฉ2021 MeanFreePath LLC